EMI Psychometric Properties
Study Summary: Update on the EMI for Infants and Toddlers (Greenwood et al., 2018)
Purpose
To evaluate the scalability, validity, and sensitivity of the Early Movement Indicator (EMI)—a brief, play-based assessment tool used for universal screening and progress monitoring of movement skills in infants and toddlers.
Sample
Group |
Details |
Programs |
15 early childhood programs across 6 U.S. states |
Models: Area Education Agencies, Part C, Family Centers, EHS, Community Care |
|
Assessors |
94 early childhood professionals (e.g., home visitors, PTs/OTs, teachers) |
Children |
628 infants/toddlers, ages 6–36 months (Mean = 18 months) |
50% male, 85% from low-income backgrounds |
|
15% had IFSPs; 37% of those had movement-related goals |
|
Home languages: 59% English, 36% Spanish, 5% other |
Method
Component |
Description |
Assessment Tool |
EMI (Early Movement Indicator), part of the IGDI suite; measures five key movement skills |
Key Skills Measured |
Transition in Position, Grounded Locomotion, Vertical Locomotion, Throw/Roll, Catch/Trap |
Administration |
6-minute play session using movement-evoking toys with a familiar adult |
Scoring |
Frequency counts of observed skills → Total Movement Score (movements per minute) |
Certification |
Assessors trained to 85% coding reliability; annual recalibration via video scoring |
Data Collection |
2,258 total assessments (mean = 3.6 assessments per child) |
Analytic Approach |
Multilevel growth curve modeling (MGCM) to examine skill trajectories and impact of moderators |
Findings
Research Question |
Finding |
1. Scalability |
EMI was successfully scaled across diverse programs and settings with support from a web-based system. |
2. Sensitivity to Growth |
Total Movement increased with age, showing a curvilinear growth pattern (fast early growth, then slowing). |
3. Continuum of Skill Development |
Key skills emerged and grew at different rates, consistent with a theoretical developmental sequence. |
4. Moderators of Growth |
– Gender: No significant differences |
- IFSP: Significant only when movement concern was documented
- Home Language: Spanish/Other-language children had significantly higher movement rates at 36 months |
Implications
- For Practice: EMI provides a practical, repeatable tool for tracking movement development and informing IFSPs. It enables early educators and families to make timely, data-based intervention decisions.
- For Research: Future studies should work toward nationally representative benchmarks, explore links between movement and language/cognition, and examine cultural moderators.